Architecture Overview
A production-ready AI agent for Business Intelligence requires four interconnected layers: event ingestion, data processing, semantic governance, and AI interaction. Each layer serves a specific purpose while working together to deliver trusted, actionable intelligence.
Enterprise AI Agent Architecture Stack
Component Deep Dive
Cloud Pub/Sub
Event Ingestion
Pub/Sub serves as the nervous system of your AI agent, capturing events from across your enterprise in real-time.
- Transaction events from POS systems
- IoT sensor data streams
- Application logs and metrics
- External API webhooks
- User activity events
BigQuery
Data Processing & ML
BigQuery processes both real-time and historical data, combining storage efficiency with ML capabilities.
- Streaming inserts for real-time data
- Partitioned tables for cost efficiency
- BigQuery ML for in-database predictions
- Remote functions for custom logic
- Materialized views for performance
Looker (LookML)
Semantic Governance
LookML defines the semantic layer that grounds AI agents in business truth, preventing hallucination.
- Centralized metric definitions
- Dimension and measure governance
- Row-level security controls
- PDTs for pre-aggregation
- Data freshness with Datagroups
Vertex AI Gemini
AI Interaction
Gemini powers natural language understanding and generation, grounded by the semantic layer.
- Natural language to LookML translation
- Context-aware conversations
- Explanation generation
- Recommendation synthesis
- Multi-modal data understanding
Integration Pattern: Grounded Agent Flow
The key innovation in this architecture is the grounding loop - every AI response passes through the semantic layer to ensure accuracy and governance compliance.
from google.cloud import bigquery
from vertexai.generative_models import GenerativeModel
import looker_sdk
class GroundedBIAgent:
"""
AI Agent grounded in LookML semantic layer
"""
def __init__(self):
self.model = GenerativeModel("gemini-1.5-pro")
self.looker = looker_sdk.init40()
self.bq_client = bigquery.Client()
def process_query(self, user_question: str) -> dict:
"""
Process natural language query with semantic grounding
"""
# Step 1: Get available semantic context from Looker
explores = self.looker.all_lookml_models()
context = self._build_semantic_context(explores)
# Step 2: Use Gemini to interpret query with semantic grounding
grounded_prompt = f"""
You are a BI analyst assistant. Answer ONLY using the
semantic definitions provided. If asked about metrics not
defined here, say you cannot answer.
AVAILABLE SEMANTIC DEFINITIONS:
{context}
USER QUESTION: {user_question}
Generate a Looker API query specification (NOT raw SQL).
Include: model, view, fields, filters, sorts.
"""
response = self.model.generate_content(grounded_prompt)
query_spec = self._parse_query_spec(response.text)
# Step 3: Execute via Looker (inherits all governance)
result = self.looker.run_inline_query(
result_format="json",
body=query_spec
)
# Step 4: Generate natural language explanation
explanation = self._generate_explanation(
question=user_question,
data=result,
query_spec=query_spec
)
return {
"answer": explanation,
"data": result,
"query_used": query_spec,
"governance": {
"grounded": True,
"semantic_model": query_spec.get("model"),
"access_validated": True
}
}
def _build_semantic_context(self, explores):
"""
Build semantic context from LookML definitions
"""
context = []
for explore in explores:
context.append(f"""
Explore: {explore.name}
Description: {explore.description}
Available Dimensions: {[d.name for d in explore.dimensions]}
Available Measures: {[m.name for m in explore.measures]}
""")
return "\n".join(context)
Semantic Layer Configuration
The LookML semantic layer must be designed with AI agents in mind. This means rich descriptions, clear naming conventions, and comprehensive metadata.
# Model file with agent-friendly documentation
explore: orders {
label: "Customer Orders"
description: "All customer orders including status, revenue, and fulfillment.
Use this explore to answer questions about sales, revenue,
order volume, and customer purchasing patterns."
# Define valid joins for the agent
join: customers {
type: left_outer
sql_on: ${orders.customer_id} = ${customers.id} ;;
relationship: many_to_one
}
join: products {
type: left_outer
sql_on: ${order_items.product_id} = ${products.id} ;;
relationship: many_to_one
}
}
view: orders {
sql_table_name: analytics.fct_orders ;;
# Agent needs clear descriptions for every field
dimension: order_id {
primary_key: yes
type: number
sql: ${TABLE}.order_id ;;
description: "Unique identifier for each order"
}
dimension_group: order {
type: time
timeframes: [raw, date, week, month, quarter, year]
sql: ${TABLE}.order_timestamp ;;
description: "When the order was placed. Use for time-based analysis."
}
dimension: order_status {
type: string
sql: ${TABLE}.status ;;
description: "Current status: pending, processing, shipped, delivered, cancelled"
suggestions: ["pending", "processing", "shipped", "delivered", "cancelled"]
}
# Measures with business context
measure: total_revenue {
type: sum
sql: ${TABLE}.order_total ;;
value_format_name: usd
description: "Total order value in USD. Excludes cancelled and returned orders."
filters: [order_status: "-cancelled, -returned"]
# Tags help agents understand when to use this metric
tags: ["revenue", "sales", "financial", "primary_metric"]
}
measure: order_count {
type: count_distinct
sql: ${TABLE}.order_id ;;
description: "Number of unique orders placed"
filters: [order_status: "-cancelled"]
tags: ["volume", "count", "orders"]
}
measure: average_order_value {
type: number
sql: ${total_revenue} / NULLIF(${order_count}, 0) ;;
value_format_name: usd
description: "Average revenue per order (AOV). Key e-commerce metric."
tags: ["aov", "average", "efficiency"]
}
}
Implementation Challenges & Solutions
Implementing enterprise AI agents requires careful attention to governance, latency, and cost management. Rushing to production without proper guardrails leads to hallucination incidents, security vulnerabilities, and runaway costs.
Challenge 1: Latency vs. Accuracy Tradeoff
Real-time agent responses require fast semantic lookups. Solution: Pre-compute semantic context and cache LookML metadata. Use PDTs for frequently-requested aggregations.
Challenge 2: Cost Management
LLM API calls and BigQuery queries can escalate quickly. Solution: Implement query cost estimation before execution, use result caching, and set hard limits on concurrent agent sessions.
Challenge 3: Governance at Scale
As agents proliferate, maintaining consistent governance becomes complex. Solution: Centralize all semantic definitions in LookML, implement audit logging for every agent action, and use Looker's access controls.
Challenge 4: User Trust
Users need to understand and trust agent outputs. Solution: Always show the source - display the LookML query used, the data freshness, and any filters applied.
Implementation Readiness Checklist
Data Foundation
- BigQuery data warehouse deployed
- Data quality monitoring in place
- Partitioning strategy defined
- Real-time ingestion configured
Semantic Layer
- LookML models documented
- All metrics have descriptions
- Access controls configured
- PDTs optimized for common queries
AI Integration
- Vertex AI project provisioned
- Gemini API access enabled
- Grounding prompts tested
- Fallback responses defined
Governance
- Audit logging enabled
- Cost alerts configured
- Human escalation paths defined
- Model update procedures documented
Ready to Implement AI Agents?
Our team specializes in designing and deploying enterprise-grade AI agent architectures on Google Cloud. Let's discuss your use case.
Schedule Architecture Review